SmoothSpan Blog

For Executives, Entrepreneurs, and other Digerati who need to know about SaaS and Web 2.0.

What is SaaS? Can it Exist Without the On-Premises Comparison?

Posted by Bob Warfield on October 17, 2007

I had two different conversations recently where the people I was talking to were reluctant to use the term “SaaS”.  To them it equated to something a non-SaaS ISV was trying to get to, but if you didn’t have that non-SaaS Enterprise ISV background, you thought more in terms of calling it “Web 2.0” or just “web software.”  Interestingly, they were kind of uncomfortable with the whole “Service” component of SaaS as well.  We’ve all heard the dramatic artifice that says there is no Good without Evil, because Good is only a relative term and it needs an opposite to give it meaning.  These folks seemed to imply SaaS was the same.

On a somewhat related note, a lot of folks who will answer to the name “SaaS” actual prefer “On-demand.”  I can’t quite get to the bottom of why, but the feeling I get is that SaaS is a little too caught up in Marc Benioff and Salesforce.com, or maybe its more a question of which term they grew up with.  Note that the “service” piece is once again missing from On-demand.

After more back and forth, I was able to boil out two issues that relate to this. 

First let’s talk about Service.  While a SaaS (or On-demand or web software) provider wants to deliver to the customer the benefits of service, at the same time they want to relentlessly eliminate the cost of service delivery.  They do this through economies of scale, but more powerfully, they do it by writing software that eliminates the human component of the service.  This is the prime function of multitenancy.  It’s possible to manage a bunch of instances by hand, but it would be very expensive to do so.  The first step is to write a bunch of scripts and perhaps use virtualization to reduce those costs.  That still is not cheap.  The next step is to actually build the necessary automation into the fabric of the application itself.  This dramatically lowers the cost of the service by replacing manual activity with software.

The result is that companies in the SaaS business often do not think of themselves as Service companies.  They’re actively trying to eliminate service by replacing it with software so that they can scale more efficiently and pass the savings along to customers.  These folks want to be known as software companies and not just companies that added service to software.  It’s an interesting nuance.

The second issue is simpler, and has to do with the customer.  Companies selling B2B are much more likely to consider themselves as SaaS, while companies selling to consumers think of themselves as having web software.

This business of putting computing in the cloud has a ways to go before we’re all on the same page about exactly how to talk about it.  The good news is I’ve talked to many companies using the model and they’re nearly all doing quite well without having to spend a fortune on marketing.  There’s a tremendous appetite among potential customers and everyone agrees it’s gotten a lot easier to sell over time.

2 Responses to “What is SaaS? Can it Exist Without the On-Premises Comparison?”

  1. troywing said

    Good post.
    the key word in SaaS for me is Service.
    Without technology and software, you wouldn’t have SaaS, but the whole point is you are delivering an easy to use, low cost of ownership, configurable solution to customers which solves specific business problems while eliminating the need to even think about what software you have to install, server setup and DBMS.

    I would also be interested in hearing your thoughts about salesforce.com and its APEX platform for “On-Demand” development.

    Troy Wing

  2. smoothspan said

    Troy, I agree, the perceived benefit is Service, but successful SaaS automates that Service rather than providing it manually. This is a differentiator from the old hosted models.

    RE Apex/Force, I worry that it doesn’t go far enough in this respect. There is minimal difference between Force and simply outsourcing your hosting other than that it connects well to Salesforce and its ecosystem. I’ve written that Force may fall into the trap many SaaS vendors complain about in that it is a pretty ordinary platform that has been hosted. Same old software as a service, SoSaaS, as one journalist calls it.

    More here:

    https://smoothspan.wordpress.com/2007/09/19/the-ugly-truth-about-the-force-platform-salesforces-is-no-better-than-saps-or-oracles/

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: